MSc and PhD Reflections

Reflections contributed by MSc and PhD students of the Ergonomics Unit/UCL.

1999/2000: Simon Li 150 150 John

1999/2000: Simon Li

 Date of MSc: 1999/2000

 

 MSc Project Title:  :

 Navigation in Small Screen Devices

 

Pre-MSc Background:  

BSc Psychology

 

Pre-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

Have no idea of how knowledge from psychology can be applied to the design of technology but was very eager to find out. At the time, it all sounded a bit like magic – by understanding the human (psychology) we can better design computer systems that are user-friendly. Also, I did not think (at all) about the distinction between science and engineering but I have always viewed psychology (especially cognitive psychology) and computer science as sciences; and I guess my pre-MSc view of HCI was that it was an applied science.

 

Post-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

So, I discovered then HCI is not magic. Had trouble in making the link between what we know about psychology and the design of technology. It was the HCI methods (e.g. task analysis, evaluation techniques, etc) that were more useful when it comes to designing or redesigning technology – experience from the design week and the MSc project.

Slowly seeing the distinction between science and engineering but couldn’t get my head round the conception of an engineering discipline for HCI. Still saw HCI as an applied science because of the HCI psychology (e.g. GOMS) that we had learnt about.

 

Subsequent-to-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

My view of HCI as a discipline changed from applied science to engineering – this happened when I did my PhD at UCLIC (the successor of the EU). My research interest in HCI has always been in the scientific knowledge of HCI but the distinction between the science, design and engineering components of HCI has helped me to build my own HCI identity.

 

Additional Reflections:

I am not sure if I (will ever) understand the conception of HCI but it has helped me to build my HCI identity and see HCI as a discipline in its own right. I still have fond memories of the lectures on the D+L conception – they are very good at stirring debates (sometimes quite heated too) among some students during pub hours after lectures. We often get two main groups of students in the after-lecture pub sessions: one group would be the passionate (or argumentative) students who want to try to understand the conception by having a debate; or some think they understand and just want to debate about it. The other group would be students who just do not see the relevance of it or simply do not want to try to understand; and their reactions to having such debate in a pub usually comprise of expressions like “oh no”, “can we talk about something else?”, etc. Therefore, to the students, the lectures on the conception of HCI is a bit like marmite – you either love it or ate it.

 

 

 

 

1998/99 Mark Bendig 150 150 John

1998/99 Mark Bendig

This short CV is acting as a temporary place-holder, until Mark’s reflections are received.

Human Factors Senior Engineer

Magnox Ltd

 – Present (1 year 4 months) Human Factors Specialist

Babcock Marine, Plymouth (formerly DML)

 –  (10 months)Plymouth, United Kingdom

Human Factors Specialist
NATS

 –  (2 months)4000 Parkway, Whiteley, Fareham, Hants PO15 7FL

Senior Human Factors Consultant

Atkins Management Consultants

 –  (1 year 11 months)

Consultant

Greenstreet Berman Ltd

 –  (2 years 9 months)

Human Factors consultant

Synergy

 –  (less than a year)

Post graduate

National Air Traffic Services

 –  (less than a year)

1985/87 Steve Howard 150 150 John

1985/87 Steve Howard

Sadly, Steve died in 2013, well before his time. However, his wife Anna was so positive about Steve’s time at UCL and so keen for him to figure in the Reflections, that she wrote a contribution on his behalf. I was, of course, delighted and it appears here. I guessed at Steve’s likely response to the initial questions, with help from his colleagues and friends and especially Frank Vetere (see below).

Date of MSc: 1986/1987

 

MSc  Project Title: Interface Design for a Medical Demonstration System: a case study in designing a software user interface.

Pre MSc Background: Practical engineering experience and a degree in psychology.

Pre MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics: Aware of applied psychology; but no detailed knowledge of, or exposure to, HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics


Post MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics: Aware in some detail of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics as evidenced by his MSc project.

Subsequent to MSc View of HCI/ Cognitive Ergonomics: 
Steve’s view can be inferred from his subsequent career, as described by Frank Vetere, ex-student and colleague: Steve went on to study (PhD), teach and research HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics, as evidenced by his publications. Soon after joining Swinburne University of Technology in 1990, Steve chaired OZCHI’94 and laid the foundations for what is now an important regional conference. He established SCHIL (the Swinburne Computer-Human Interaction Laboratory) and continued to strengthen Australian HCI by being technical co-chair at OZCHI in 1997 and INTERACT in 2000. In 2000, Steve moved to the University of Melbourne, where he immediately started the Interaction Design Group. Under his leadership, the group soon grew to become almost half the department, and a powerhouse of HCI research in Australia. From 2007-2010, Steve was the head of department of Information Systems. In 2009, he was appointed full professor and in 2011 became the inaugural director of the Melbourne School of Information. Steve’s contribution to HCI was recognised in 2008, when he was awarded the CHISIG medal for service to the Australian HCI community.
In just over 12 years at Melbourne University, his achievements were indeed extraordinary, but they were never at the cost of his integrity, his humanity or his generosity. His achievements were infused with a deep respect for the value of people as human beings. 

Additional Reflections:

 

Anna Howard writes: Steve Howard, at the age of 17 years, realised mid-way through a four year fitter and turner apprenticeship with British Nuclear Fuels, based at Capenhurst, Chester, UK , that he really did not want to spend his working life with his arms immersed in cold oil. BUT where to??

Having been told by his high school teachers aged 16, that he would never amount to much, so might as well leave school. He attempted to make his own choices; but rejected by MANWEB, his suggestion of a future in carpentry was dismissed out of hand by his Father. His guitar playing was not good enough to join Bob Dylan and the Band, so the only acceptable option was either to join the Army or to get an apprenticeship, which was the tradition in Steve’s family. Especially lucky were lads, whose Dads were already employed in places, where apprenticeships were available. Steve’s Father arranged a visit to his place of employment Capenhurst, where he was a fireman.

It was obvious Steve did have an interest in, and most importantly an understanding of, engineering, so not surprisingly he did well and was considered a good apprentice. An example of his skill is now a very treasured piece of ‘artwork’ in our home.

 

Jump forward to 1986 and the day Steve started at UCL; his fortuitous meeting with the ‘main man’ Prof. JL, a very grown up experience; something like going from our mini to a VW Passat, once we became parents!!

From the moment Steve set foot in the place, we knew he was in the right space for his emerging interests. He found in his fellow students a wide span of experiences and social levels, which opened up his mind to the possibilities of an academic career making new age technology  (which he himself had struggled with at undergraduate level) easier to comprehend. Rachael’s expertise was a great comfort as Steve found himself overwhelmed at times, struggling with so many unknowns.

Family and friends would ask “What is Steve doing?” I would answer Ergonomics. “Oh yes we have heard of that, it is a scandinavian design for cars and furniture”!!

Steve had a hard route to climb; but climb it he did. Our love for each other enabled Steve to rise to a position unimaginable, when we met in 1982.

Being at the start of a ‘new’ discipline was exciting; but the challenges enormous, not least the daily journey across London by tube and train to NPL Teddington (his sponsor), with sudden bouts of serious anxiety attacks. Pivotal in his progress was the steady guidance of his sponsor Dianne Murray.

 

January 1990, there was an early morning job interview conference call from our home in Walsall to Melbourne, Australia. Coincidentally, it was Steve’s rather unique additional apprenticeship qualification alongside his UCL MSc that got him the position at Swinburne University, then known as Swinburne Institute of Technology.

From 1999 to his untimely death in April 2013, he was at a place he felt to be the very essence of UCL, Melbourne University, where he had unlimited opportunity in research and revelled in the opportunities to promote his passion HCI.

UCL was never far from Steve’s thoughts and he spoke of its influence on his thinking Prof JL, often remembering lectures, field visits and the pathology lab at The Royal Free Hospital with clarity!

Every academic institution has a significant part to play in our exciting, fast-shrinking world and for future students to have access to excellence, it is important there be an archive, where information on the development of a subject be available, so I am pleased UCL is taking this initiative in addition to this website.

Steve answered some of the questions; but remained excited by the on-going development of a subject at the very core of what it is to be human. Questioning.

 

 

2000/02 Gigi Demming 150 150 John

2000/02 Gigi Demming

This brief CV is a temporary place-holder until Gigi’s reflections are received.

GiGi Demming

Experience

UX Research Manager
Guardian News & Media

 – Present (7 months)

Senior User Researcher
Sony Computer Entertainment Europe

 – Present (5 years 6 months)

Principal Consultant

Amberlight

 –  (6 years 5 months) University College London

BSc, Biopsychology and Cognitive Science

1995/96 Kieran Duignan 150 150 John

1995/96 Kieran Duignan

1995/96: Kieran Duignan

 

Date of MSc: 1995/96

 

MSc Project Title:

Using Soft Systems Methodology to Elicit User Requirements for Adapting a Socio-technical System

 

Pre-MSc Background:

Counselling,   career guidance,  training research/development,  sales

 

Pre-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

As an emergent domain in Cognitive Psychology

 

Post-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

As a buoyantly emergent domain in Cognitive Psychology with potential both for improving organisational performance and for being abused by managers, inclined to indulge the dark side of their power.

 

Subsequent-to-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

As a domain in social, economic and organisational behaviour with enormous potential for improvement and for exploitation.

 

Additional Reflections:

Teaching and academic supervision on the MSc (Ergonomics) in University College London 1995/6 introduced me to a robust approach to applied research.  While it took me quite some time to figure out how to apply this approach in the sphere of work in which I have since concentrated – Safety Psychology and Ergonomics.

The course was a positively transformative experience beyond my expectations, by virtue of the quality of teaching and generous supervision, formal and informal, in the ‘learning community,’ facilitated by so many inspiring staff.

Inclusiveness remains another marked feature of the course for me:  15 years before The Equality Act 2010, diversity of several kinds was evident in the student group.  I still smile when I recall the occasion of acute stress I experienced after I created a portrait with twelve flags for an end-of-term celebration and found myself very sharply challenged by a normally very placid and amiable fellow, who strongly objected to the inclusion of the national flag of one Middle Eastern country, while omitting that of his own. I quickly amended the portrait to include the thirteenth.

For the information (and amusement) of students from other years, the end of term celebration in question included the presentation to Professor Long of a certificate, which read as follows:

The Tri-cycles and HIC Unit 95/96 bestow on

Professor John Long

Master of the House

A certificate of Special Merit for his intellectual leadership and linguistic prowess –

That surpasseth all understanding.

 

The last phrase might ring a bell or two for many students. However, John assures me that the certificate, now framed, continues to have pride of place in his kitchen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994/1995 Amanda Widdowson 150 150 John

1994/1995 Amanda Widdowson

 

Project Title: Safety, Job Satisfaction and Mental Workload: A Comparison of Two Contrasting (London Underground) Lines

 

Pre-MSc Background: BSc Psychological Sciences (Psychology and Biology) but struggled to find a related career.

 

Pre-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics: A vocational use of Psychology

 

Post-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

The MSc immediately allowed me to practice Ergonomics. I’ve been employed in that field ever since – its great to be paid to do something I believe in. The terms ‘Human Factors’ and ‘Ergonomics’ seem to be poorly defined. Whilst Human Factors used to encompass Ergonomics, now the terms are interchangeable. I’ve still never heard a good succinct definition of Ergonomics! In my experience, non-ergonomists typically underestimate the scope of the discipline. We still need to keep fighting for greater recognition and understanding of the benefits of Ergonomics.

Screen shot 2015-02-04 at 15.49.09

Human Factors Consulting Team Lead

Thales Consulting & Engineering (Quintec Associates Ltd)

 – Present (1 year 5 months)Responsible for managing a large team of experienced human factors consultants. The team currently provides human factors expertise for clients in the Defence, Rail and Nuclear industries. Quintec is the leading edge of Thales consulting in the UK, providing management, systems and technology consultancy services to clients who need to deliver technically challenging and complex projects.

Human Factors Function Manager
TubeLines

 –  (5 years 9 months)Professional head of human factors/ergonomics for Tube Lines, (later London Underground), managing a team of human factors professionals of various levels of experience. Responsible for maintaining & developing the competence of those individuals and ensuring all work conducted by the company was compliant with human factors standards & best practice. The majority of the work pertained to London Underground station refurbishments; train design; signalling control centre design; software design, incident investigation and input to safety cases.

Human Factors Integration Manager

Crossrail

 –  (6 months)LondonInitiated human factors strategy for Crossrail

Senior HF Consultant
Vectra Group Ltd

 –  (3 years)

HF Consultant
Network Rail

 –  (2 years)

Senior HF Consultant
BAE Systems

 –  (5 years)

Psychologist

DERA

 –  (3 years)

 

1984/1985 Vinai Kumar 150 150 John

1984/1985 Vinai Kumar

Date of MSc 1984/85

Project Title

Evaluating the Usability of Laptop Computers (Sponsored by British Telecom, Ipswich)

Pre-MSc Background:

B.E. Mechanical Engineering (University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India)

Design Training programme at the National Institute of Design (NID), Ahmedabad, India

Pre-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

Between 1981 and 1984, I studied (Classical) Ergonomics on my own and applied this in my teaching at the National Institute of Design (NID), Ahmedabad India. I had no knowledge of HCI and Cognitive Ergonomics at this time.

Post-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

In my view the inputs in HCI and Cognitive Ergonomics were ahead of time in 1984-85. Cognitive Ergonomics immensely helped me in understanding the fallibility of human-decision making and action taking in complex and dynamic real-life situations. These inputs later led me to develop a human-centred systems approach for problem solving in our business environments. This is an easy to apply approach useful for engineers, designers and business managers.

Subsequent-to-MSc View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics

I strongly feel that Cognitive Ergonomics is a discipline which must be taught to all the major decision makers in Education, Industry, Business, and Government. This will enable decision makers and managers to understand why so many man-made systems fail or do not perform as desired and expected. Problem solving with an understanding of the cognitive processes of humans in a target context will help evolve and implement more workable and sustainable solutions.

Additional Reflections

Educational frameworks in engineering, and business management are too narrowly focused on technology and selling respectively. However, in real-life, any user or consumer would ideally like to have a product or service that is well-integrated across aesthetics, usability, technical performance, and affordability. A collaborative and interdisciplinary problem solving approach is the key to design and manage an appropriate value to a user. Cognitive science, ergonomics, and systems thinking (which are rarely taught to the professional problem solvers) are an essential component of a holistic and integrative problem solving process.

Professor John Long has influenced me in a very significant way by leading me into the realm of cognitive science and ergonomics. This was a life changing phase particularly in the 1980s when HCI and Cognitive ergonomics were in a nascent stage (there were no books on these subjects at that time!). Back in India, these terms were totally alien even to those who were in the field of ergonomics and design. I sincerely thank Prof. John for always encouraging me, and for appreciating my work during the programme at UCL. Although I would have liked to work further at a deeper level in the area of Cognitive Ergonomics and Systems Thinking, I still could manage to contribute to the development of a new paradigm for the Industrial Design process at the educational as well as professional levels. A large body of students and working designers benefited from this new way of looking at design (it was usually aesthetics and style focused). In the 1990s a significant number of my design students joined and influenced usability and user experience design initiative of the Indian IT industry, inspired by my inputs in design projects.

Most of my thoughts, beliefs and professional work are and will continue to be based on cognitive ergonomics and systems thinking in design and management.

 

1996/97 James Sinclair 150 150 John

1996/97 James Sinclair

JL – I always remember James as a very creative and self-possessed student. An unusual combination. When inviting him to contribute his MSc Reflections, I wrote: ‘Feel free to do something novel – that was always your forte, as I remember’. He seems to have taken me at my word – no answers to my questions, for example. Also,  I am not sure that I have got the hang of this horse-racing thing.  Have you? For the purposes in hand, however, James was my horse and I have won (I think…..). Thanks James, much appreciated.

To which James replied:

 Hi John
that made me smile, I love the idea of being a horse and it was fun to do.  And, I didn’t mention it, but  I was lucky falling into HCI at the time I did as its made a big difference to my life.

HCI Reflections, Horse Racing & Chocolates

A Day at the Races
A Day at the Races

I did the course at the end of the 90’s. I hadn’t any practical experience with computers but had a background in psychology, philosophy and art, and as  it turned out this was a pretty good combo for HCI. More luck than planning.

I  enjoyed the course and the people I met. I thought it was like a foundation course as I got to sample lots of different bits and pieces. There are a few things that have stuck with me; we had a practical design fortnight where we had to complete a project, from concept to prototype. This was great fun, very stimulating and really useful. I came a way feeling that the course should do more of this. All the computing elements were good as I was keen to learn more about this. I found the introduction to programming especially useful as I hadn’t done anything like this before.  It’s fun making stuff that works and this really helps when it comes to testing and communicating and idea. And then there was John’s Engineering approach. I liked the idea but thought, as I did with a lot of the HCI stuff, that there was a little too much emphasis on the method and process rather than doing.  I felt at the time that by  focusing so much on how to go about a thing  gets in the way of doing it.

Ok, so how has this translated to work. Well a lot of what I currently do has an engineer-ish (sorry John I can remember the exact definition, but I feel I’m sticking to the spirit of the thing) quality. By this I mean we make changes for a reason, measure the impact and make adjustments based on the feedback.

I work for commercial  clients who generally want to sell  more.  This, for me, involves running  quite a lot of live tests, AB, Multivariate and personalisation. In short, creating alternate versions of a web page, splitting the traffic  so that different users are given different pages and measuring the results. The goal is always to outperform the what is currently there or (the default page). Oh, and personalisation isn’t as grand as it sounds. Its a great word as it immediately conjures up in clients minds a world were every customer is dealt with on a one to one basis, bespoke tailoring always pops into my head when I hear it.  The reality is, we operate at in broader strokes, you are a return visitor, or you are at university, then this is for you.

When I started doing live testing I was not particularly well informed. From chatting to others, who knew a bit more than me, I was open to the idea that what I would consider to be a well designed page had little  baring on what would work. I had been shown pages that were truly ugly, not well organised and had nothing that looked there was a sense of purpose behind them, but had apparently performed miraculously.  So God is not a designer?

The first few years of running these tests were emotionally exhausting.   Sometimes we (me, project manager and client) would get lucky,  most the time we wouldn’t. We would set a test live and then watch the results day by day .  It’s  like gambling at the race track, I’m not a gambler, but you pick your favourite and then watch it go.  Horse racing is probably more rational, horses have form, this was a crazy horse race, a horse race organised by the Marx brothers. We would see a particular design top the results table for week. When we returned on Monday morning the picture had reversed. This happened time and time again. What made it more frustrating was that the current winner had hit a level of significance where it would be reasonable to call it (as a winner), 95%, or 99% and in some cases higher.  Not so much engineering, more the occult , Black Magic perhaps. We got to the point that when our horse was winning, we wanted to stop the race.  Definitely not engineering.

This left me feeling like I wanted to get out of the live testing business. We lost a few project managers along the way, and client side there was quite a bit of shuffling. However I didn’t have much choice so I started chatting  with a colleague and scratching my head. I wondered what would a test look like if it we just ran the same design but showed it to different groups?  Then after some more chatting, my colleague helped me realise that I didn’t need to run the test, I could simulate it.   The basic ingredients of one of these tests is a number of experiences ( we have run  tests from 3 – 128 variations of  a page ), each assigned to  a group of users ( once a user is allocated to an experience this is the only experience they will see), and measured against some metric ( how many tickets purchased).  So with a bit of  Java Script I built a simulation to see what the results of this test would look like if there were absolutely no variation in the pages shown. All I had to do is plug in the number of variations, the size of the population ( how much traffic will see the test) and the baseline conversion rate.  And voila,  what you get is a Marx brothers horse race. Great fun, but not good for the nerves.

Here is the simulation, so that you can have a go yourselves. It should give you  an idea of the range of variation you can get due to the sample. Play around with the numbers, hit the refresh button a few times, and see how often you can get a significant result (any thing above 95% confidence) by essential doing nothing.

http://www.paperst.co.uk/MVT/mvt.htm

The key to this is random distribution. As we can’t control the who sees each experience, we have to assign them randomly in order to remove any sampling  bias.  Our population that gets randomly assigned to a particular group will be made up of convertors and non-convertors. Some groups will have more convertors, others less.  One of these groups will be our default. It could be at the top of the list or at the bottom, who knows? The uplift (positive or negative) is calculated off the default. As its random, it changes each time we run it, this week my horse is winning, next week its some one else’s. I call this simulation the Black Magic box. So in the words of Forest Gump, “Live testing is like a box of chocolates”.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Halimahtun Mohd Khalid PhD 150 150 John

Halimahtun Mohd Khalid PhD

Date of PhD:

17 January 1990

Thesis Title:

Human Factors of Integrating Speech and Manual Input Devices: The Case of Computer Aided Design

Pre-PhD Background:

M.Sc. Applied Experimental Psychology (Monash University); M.Sc. (Prelim.) Behavioural Sciences (La Trobe University).

Pre-PhD View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

HCI was an emerging discipline and very little was published in the literature. At that time the prevailing interest was CHI which focused on design of computer systems for interacting with users. Physical Ergonomics was well established, while Cognitive Ergonomics was almost unknown. Cognitive Science was well documented especially Psychology. The application of Cognitive Psychology to Ergonomics problems in order to understand the design of user interfaces of products and systems became an exciting area for research. The Ergonomics Unit at UCL was a pioneer in Cognitive Ergonomics.

Post-PhD View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

The initial development of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics in UK bears the mark of Professor John Long, who took the discipline to a higher level. His emphasis on theory development in all PhD work suggests his important contribution to theory-building and methods development. His students may not have lived up to his expectations, but the seeds of reason have been sowed and created a new challenge and mindset for the transformed centre, UCL Interaction Centre, or UCLIC.

The first Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction by Martin Helander appeared in 1988. The contents were still CHI-driven with contributions from scientists in the Computer Science field.

The early works of the Ergonomics Unit (prior to UCLIC) emphasised on HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics in various application domains, including: teleshopping, training, postal services, naval displays & control, computer aided design. All of this contributed to the growing discipline.

The concept of usability emerged in tandem with better understanding of user interface design. Multimedia too became an important research area for HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics.

Subsequent-to-PhD View of HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics:

Today the discipline has expanded ubiquitously. But Theory development has not expanded much. Many theories and methods are still borrowed from the Behavioural Sciences, in particular Psychology. There is no theory of HCI!

The literature in this area is based on research which is not grounded in theory, relative to research in psychology. The rigour of scientific research lags behind the desire to produce quick results for the sake of publication.

There is a need for experts in HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics to come together and focus on theory development to support rapid development in computer and communications technologies. Products and systems are getting more difficult to use, especially for the aged population.

Additional Reflections:

I was introduced to HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics in 1985 when I presented a paper at the Ergonomics Society conference at the University of Nottingham. John Long, the guru, who became my supervisor afterwards, presented papers on design of naval information displays and also on teleshopping. I was at first indecisive if I should be a candidate for the doctoral program at his Ergonomics Unit (EU). I was dressed in my formal traditional Malay costume, unlike the rest of the delegates who were casual. Many thoughts must have gone through his mind as he scrutinised me. It all changed dramatically when he heard me talk for the first time. I responded confidently to his line of questioning over my previous MSc work on central task complexity and peripheral vision.

My early days at UCL began with a series of interviews by Andy Whitefield, Andrew Life, and Dan Diaper. I asked them what it was like to work with John. They smiled and I understood that it was tough but rewarding.

Today, I am living proof of John Long’s rigorous and impactful training. The PhD program was specially designed to impart knowledge and skills as well as shared values and experiences. His style puts him apart from those I had trained with earlier. He presented no answers to my work but only questions and more questions. This helped me to develop an inquiring and reflective approach; also to think out of the box. At times his high workload distanced him from the supervisory role. But in turn I became groomed to be self-reliant, directed, and focused.

The PhD candidates were an integral part of the EU family. We attended monthly meetings to deliver progress report, and to be assigned tasks on rotational basis so as to develop multi-tasking skills. The tasks enriched our experiences in communication, organization, and documentation, which became useful and valuable when we embarked on our career. The requirement to follow some of the exciting MSc site visits enhanced our problem-solution skills, such as visits to the London underground, coal mine, hospital, London Design Council, to name but a few.

While I do not consume alcohol, the numerous pub crawls on Fridays, exposed me to the British way of life, and more importantly, to get to know the growing ‘family’ as the Unit accepted more graduate students. John and his beloved late wife, Doris, also hosted several alumni gatherings at his beautiful home in Muswell Hill. The concept of networking and social programming emerged from his purposeful convictions.

Despite the challenging and stressful environment of London and UCL, I completed my training within the three year timeline to accomplish my dream as the first foreign PhD student at EU. The greatest achievement was to obtain my PhD in Cognitive Ergonomics from the University College London, and to be supervised by Professor John Long and Dr. Andy Whitefield. I am proud to have them as my mentors.

I owe my successes today to John Long’s vision and dedication that crafted a future of curiosity and motivation for HCI/Cognitive Ergonomics research. The training program that I graduated from was a benchmark for quality work.

I wish John soul-searching happiness and continued good health, and the evolved UCL Interaction Centre a stimulating future.

 

Halimahtun Mohd Khalid, PhD, CPE

1986-1989

1986/87 Dipak Chaun 150 150 John

1986/87 Dipak Chaun

Screen shot 2015-02-22 at 19.21.49

Date of MSc 1986/87

 

Project Title:  An Ergonomic Evaluation of Ice (Water) Cooling Garments

 

Pre-MSc Background:  RGN General Nurse, BSc (Hons) Psychology

 

Pre-MSc background of HCI:  Well, it was almost a whole new subject for me and my initial reflections when reading my MSc were, that is what I wanted to do!  Lot of medical technology was starting to move towards use of software and poor design issues had prompted me to want to read Ergonomics.  Ian Ross who also graduated from EU and my senior and a peer from my undergrad days asked me to check the UCL course out.

 

I remember visiting the department for my interview and I met Prof Long and Rachel and I was wowed and even more excited, when offered a place on the course.

 

Of note were the social events both at John’s home in North London with his wife, Doris, and the Christmas parties held at the Royal Free, where we were entertained by Steve Pheasant (who sadly passed away at a young age), playing the saxophone and Don Grieve playing the piano.  Ivan Brown and Paul Branton were amazing to listen to, too, with some of the research techniques used by them in their studies, which today would make the ethics committee shiver with fear!

 

Fond memories of being wowed by Rachel’s work reside in my memory and the site visits certainly made the course practical and interesting. EU at the time in many respects, was at the forefront of HCI and certainly some of the theories and concepts clearly developed around  that time: of note is the Conception for HCI, but I must say I am embarrassed to admit I cannot remember what that was about.  Perhaps a coffee with Prof and /or Johnny Dowell may jog the grey matter into action.

 

My MSc year went in a flash and it was a year of work hard and play hard.  Prof Long’s inaugural lecture took place that year and we had an intriguingly bright bunch of students, included amongst them were the likes of Leon Straker, now Professor at Curtin, and Mark Andrew, now residing and working in Australia, doing consultancy work and writing plays.

 

Socialising was not only restricted to the faculty, but I also remember the fond times spent with Steve Howard at his flat in Leyton (who sadly died suddenly last year).

 

That Prof Long was an intellectual would be an understatment, sitting in his lectures not only inspired the students but at times left them taking a double take and still not comprehending what had been said.  John though was an amazing man to be taught by and he was particularly supportive of all his students.

 

Post MSc:

As it would have it, my first job as an ergonomist was working on the Type 3 Frigate Command and Control System.  I soon got offered a job at CCD Design and Ergonomics, where we looked at the application of HCI on a range of projects; but my work was predominantly on conventional ergonomics and HF.

 

There are many fond moments and people that I could reflect on and talk about.  The time spent at EU helped me with a career change and has finally also enabled me to explore the application of EHF in a very complex healthcare system.

 

John you truly inspired the students and you had that cheeky tenacity to challenge and tease the best out of students, particularly in those study sessions, when visiting PhD students and / or lecturers attended the Unit.

 

Dipak included these images for old times’ sake from his project report: REVIEW OF LITERATURE ON COOLING GARMENTS (NB Dipak is not wearing the vests…..)

 

Screen shot 2015-02-22 at 19.27.30

 

Screen shot 2015-02-22 at 19.27.12

 – Present (23 years 1 month)(Head of Risk Managment

Head of Safety and Non Clinical Risk

Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust

 –  (1 year)Walsall, United Kingdom

Health and Safety Manager

Nottingham City Hospital

 –  (1 year 1 month)Home - Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Ergonomics Adviser

Leicester City Council

 –  (2 years 3 months)Leicester, United Kingdom

Ergonomics Consultant

CCD Design and Ergonomics Consultants

 –  (2 years 7 months)

Human Factors Advisor

Ferranti Computers Ltd

 –  (6 months)

Education

University of PortsmouthUniversity of Portsmouth
Accredited Security Management Specialist (CFSMS), Counter Fraud and Security Managment,Pass

BSc (Hons), Psychology

RGN, General Nursing

1School3Skills & Expertise1Group